As the years trickle along, cars keep getting better and better. Back in the ‘90s we thought by the year 2010 we would all be
 |
| The 3s uniquely shaped grille foreshadows the car's grin-inducing driving dynamics. (Photo: Canadian Auto Press) |
in computer driven electric cars that ran on green energy captured from rainbows. This technology exists, except the rainbow thing (it is rumored that Toyota is working on it), however, consumer demand has kept automakers improving the standard car recipe, rather than replacing it with something else.
People still enjoy their cars, and take pleasure in driving. The success of the first Mazda3 was a testament to that. It looked great, was well built, and the feeling you got from the driver’s seat was nearly good enough to compare it to similar sized cars from premium brands.
The new 2010 model takes everything the old Mazda3 was good at and pushes it even further. It makes you wonder how they possibly could make the next one better and still make money.
 |
| Serious upscale style from a small entry-level package. (Photo: Canadian Auto Press) |
It also helps you understand why there’s no real sign of computer driven cars on the horizon, en masse at least. Why would you want to drive something Microsoft engineered when you can have this fast, fun, practical, comfortable, stylish and affordable Mazda3 GT for just $23,645?
At that price, it is pretty much loaded short of a leather package and a navigation system. A completely optioned out Mazda3 sedan will hit $26,935. The base car starts at $15,995. That entry-level model doesn’t come with air-conditioning ($1,000), but it does come standard with power windows and locks, ABS with EBD (electronic brake force distribution) and a decently powerful 2.0L inline 4-cylinder with 148hp and 135 lb-ft of torque.
The
 |
| Not quite premium quality, but the 3's not that far off either. (Photo: Canadian Auto Press) |
car I drove was a GT, with a bigger 2.5L inline four, gutsier at 167hp and 168 lb-ft of torque, and bolted to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels. Fuel mileage for this engine was… okay. I averaged 8.5L/100km while driving harder than average. The published numbers are 10.1L/100km city and 6.9L/100km highway. The GT starts at $22,595 and adds the bigger engine, traction control, dynamic stability control, 17” alloy wheels, bi-Xenon HID headlights, dual-zone climate control, better seats, flashier exterior bits and lot of other goodies.
People notice this car, as it definitely wasn’t me they were looking at while I drove it around. It’s still fairly new, but the majority of people really, really like this car and talk about it. It would be safe to say, the vast majority give it two thumbs up for styling.
Inside,
 |
| Reasonable rear passenger room despite the 3's compact dimensions. (Photo: Canadian Auto Press) |
it looks just as good. It is definitely among the most stylish and modern looking interiors in the class. The knobs and buttons don’t feel cheap, and the instruments have a cool red and blue backlight to them at night. The seats themselves are well formed and supportive, and the back seat is roomy and comfortable for two adults. The stereo is quite good for an entry-level unit, too. It doesn’t have the fit and finish or quality of materials of a premium brand car, but it is two-thirds of the way to being on par with a base cabin from an Audi or BMW. The rat-fur ceiling does make it lose more than a few points, though; a woven fabric would be nicer.
It scored well with me in the driving ergonomics category. The steering wheel felt good in the hands, and tilts and telescopes, letting me put it exactly where I wanted it.
 |
| Accommodating storage expandable via 60/40 split rear seatbacks. (Photo: Canadian Auto Press) |
The seat is neither too reclined, nor too upright. The pedals are setup so you can slide your right foot easily from throttle to brake, and I didn’t have to stretch to reach the bottom of the clutch.
It doesn’t have the power to call it fast, but it definitely can run. The smooth and linear power delivery was available when I wanted it, and braking force was there when I needed it, making the Mazda3 a hoot to bounce around in.
Quick, second-gear left hand turns late at night feel great. Take a close line to the inside curb and squeeze the throttle hard as you widen out the corner. I could feel the weight shift to the right, but there was no sense of the two right tires being on edge. The car stayed balanced, which gave me confidence.
The
 |
| The new 2010 Mazda3: a lot of car for the money. (Photo: Canadian Auto Press) |
Mazda3 is satisfyingly quick, but not in a “hey look at me, I’m a rebel” kind of way. Which is better when you’re only trying to get a little enjoyment out of a quick run to fill the BBQ propane tank. With six hungry people and six partly cooked burgers waiting at home, the added time of waiting for a cop to write you a ticket will keep you at the speed limits. That’s okay though, because the Mazda3 is the kind of car you can have fun in without being reckless.
Faults? It required a little bit of a shove to put into first gear and reverse, better than half the time. Even though the car had 11,000km on it, it was still stiff. That’s it really.
This car, ten years ago, would have been quite a good little luxury offering. Today, it’s simply an above average compact car. If this is how good our entry-level cars are now, imagine what the next round will be like, or the generation after that. Getting people to buy into alternative forms of transportation is awfully tough when a car as nice as this sells for the price it does.